RESEARCH

LATEST NEWS IN GLOBAL SURGERY

Discuss the latest during our live Journal Clubs on X (formerly Twitter)!

To participate just check our JC twitter account @GlobalSurgeryJC. We announce journal clubs on our social media, so stay tuned. 

Have a suggestion for the Journal Club? Let us know

Link

Upcoming JC:

Law, T. J., et al (2024). The Global Anesthesia Workforce Survey: Updates and Trends in the Anesthesia Workforce. Anesthesia and analgesia, 139(1), 15–24. 


Sansoni, Gabriela Azevedo; Lim, Yee Siew1. World Trauma Day: An Opportunity for Change. Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice 5(2):p 35-36, May–Aug 2024.

OUR RESEARCH

INCISION: DEVELOPING THE FUTURE GENERATION OF GLOBAL SURGEONS
Vervoort, D., & Bentounsi, Z. (2019)

Since the formal establishment of the organization in 2016, InciSioN has grown to unite over 5000 members in over 75 countries and 31 formally established National Working Groups across all world regions. Through a system of virtual internships, members of the network have contributed to the World Development Indicators surgical data collection 2016 for the World Bank. InciSioN has created the standardized capacity-building curriculum Training Global Surgery Advocates, and established the annual Global Surgery Day on May, 25th as a global awareness day on surgical care around the world.

Read here

CHECKING IN ON THE SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST 2019
In collaboration with the Lifebox Foundation and Ariadne Labs

2019 marked the ten-year anniversary of the Surgical Safety Checklist, increasingly implemented in operating rooms around the world. Through this international, collaborative research project, InciSioN, Lifebox, and Ariadne Labs evaluate the dissemination, exposure, and use of the Checklist among students and residents in countries around the world with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. 

LATIN AMERICAN INDICATOR RESEARCH COLLABORATORY
In collaboration with the Rutgers University Program in Global Surgery

In 2015, the Lancet Commission in Global Surgery introduced six indicators to evaluate and monitor health systems with a focus on surgical care. In this study, InciSioN, together with its United States' National Working Group (Global Surgery Student Alliance, GSSA), collaborates with Rutgers University to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions of the indicators among students and trainees around the world, and assess their interest in pursuing global surgery work.

WORLD DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS - SURGICAL DATA COLLECTION 2016
In collaboration with the World Bank and the World Health Organization

To assess longitudinal changes in the six surgical indicators proposed by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, in 2016, a second data collection on these indicators pertaining to surgery for each country worldwide was performed. Under the supervision of Mr. Andy Leather and Dr. Justine Davies at King’s College London, and in collaboration with Dr. John Meara at Harvard University, and the WHO GIEESC (Global Initiative on Emergency and Essential Surgical Care), between July 2016 and January 2017, selected members of the International Student Surgical Network (InciSioN) took a mixed methods approach to collect this data, which have been updated in the World Bank database on July, 1st 2017.

Read here

LANDMARK PAPERS

Global surgery, obstetric, and anaesthesia indicator definitions and reporting: An Utstein consensus report
PLOS Medicine. August 2021

Revise the now five (originally six) indicators proposed in 2015 by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery for evaluating progress towards timely access to safe surgical, anaesthesia, and obstetric (SAO). This Utstein consensus report removes one of the original 6 indicators (one of 2 financial risk protection indicators was eliminated) and refined descriptions and defined data points required to construct the 5 remaining indicators: geospatial access, workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality, and catastrophic expenditure.

Read here

Innovative financing to fund surgical systems and expand surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries
BMJ Journals. June 2020

This article explores the critical role of innovative financing in scaling up surgical care in LMICs. We locate surgical system financing by using a modified fiscal space analysis. Through an analysis of published studies and case studies on recent trends in the financing of global health systems, we provide a conceptual framework that could assist policy-makers in health systems to develop innovative financing strategies to mobilise additional investments for scale-up of surgical care in LMICs. This is the first time such an analysis has been applied to the funding of surgical care. Innovative financing in global surgery is an untapped potential funding source for expanding fiscal space for health systems and financing scale-up of surgical care in LMICs.

Read here

Framework for developing a national surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia plan (NSOAPs)
British Journal of Surgery Open. July 2019

Development of a NSOAP involves eight key steps: Ministry support and ownership; situation analysis and baseline assessments; stakeholder engagement and priority setting; drafting and validation; monitoring and evaluation; costing; governance; and implementation. Drafting a NSOAP involves defining the current gaps in care, synthesizing and prioritizing solutions, and providing an implementation and monitoring plan with a projected cost for the six domains of a surgical system: infrastructure, service delivery, workforce, information management, finance and governance.

Read here

Global burden of postoperative death
The Lancet. February 2019

Learn about the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery's (LCoGS) analysis suggesting that at least 4·2 million people worldwide die within 30 days of surgery each year, and half of these deaths occur in LMICs. This number of postoperative deaths accounts for 7·7% of all deaths globally, making it the third greatest contributor to deaths, after ischaemic heart disease and stroke. Although there is a pressing need to expand surgical services to populations that are underserved, this expansion must be done in tandem with initiatives to reduce postoperative deaths. Funders and policy makers should prioritise research that aims to make surgery safer, particularly in LMICs. Routine measurement of surgical outcomes is essential to monitoring global progress in addressing the burden of postoperative deaths.

Read here

Global surgery and the sustainable development goals
The British journal of surgery. January 2019

This review examined how NSOAPs could contribute to the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs) 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 16 and 17 by 2030, focusing on their potential impact on the healthcare systems in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zambia.

Read here

Disseminating technology in global surgery
The British journal of surgery. January 2019

Employing the principles of frugal and responsible innovation, and aligning evaluation and development to high scientific standards help overcome some of the challenges in disseminating technology in global surgery. Exemplars of effective dissemination include low-cost laparoscopes, gasless laparoscopic techniques and innovative training programmes for laparoscopic surgery; low-cost and versatile external fixation devices for fractures; the LifeBox pulse oximeter project; and the use of immersive technologies in simulation, training and surgical care delivery.

Read here

Bellwether Procedures for Monitoring and Planning Essential Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Caesarean Delivery, Laparotomy, and Treatment of Open Fractures
World Journal of Surgery. June 2016

Caesarean delivery, laparotomy, and treatment of open fractures should be standard procedures performed at first-level hospitals. With further validation in other populations, local managers and health ministries may find this useful as a benchmark for what first-level hospitals can and should be able to perform on a 24/7 basis in order to ensure delivery of emergency and essential surgical care to their population. 

Read here

Generation of political priority for global surgery: a qualitative policy analysis
The Lancet. August 2015

Learn about the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery's (LCoGS) analysis suggesting that at least 4·2 million people worldwide die within 30 days of surgery each year, and half of these deaths occur in LMICs. This number of postoperative deaths accounts for 7·7% of all deaths globally,4 making it the third greatest contributor to deaths, after ischaemic heart disease and stroke. Although there is a pressing need to expand surgical services to populations that are underserved, this expansion must be done in tandem with initiatives to reduce postoperative deaths. Funders and policy makers should prioritise research that aims to make surgery safer, particularly in LMICs. Routine measurement of surgical outcomes is essential to monitoring global progress in addressing the burden of postoperative deaths.

Read here

Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development
The Lancet. April 2015

Learn about the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery's (LCoGS) five key messages on global surgery, a set of indicators and recommendations to improve access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care in LMICs, and a template for a national surgical plan.

Read here

WANT TO PUBLISH IN GLOBAL SURGERY ?

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SURGERY [ONE]

The journal global surgery is a groundbreaking, peer-review journal, dedicated to global surgery, with a unique publishing model. The journal is funded by a community, producing open access publications with fair finances. The journal aims to produce a low cost, high-quality journal that is sustainable, accessible, affordable, and meet the needs of the entire global surgery community.

Furthermore, by utilizing Bitcoin Cash, a borderless, permission list peer to peer pay system, micro-payments are possible, ensuring equitable access to all.

Authors: No article processing fee!
Peer reviewers: $10 stipend! 

Community-funded APC!
The low-cost, high quality model allows anyone from the community to gain immediate access to an article for as little as $0.10. Contributors can use traditional payment methods or Bitcoin Cash to pay towards the article's price tag. Once the community has covered the full APC, the journal recoups its running costs and the article becomes open-access!

Learn more